National Consultant Midterm Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Protected Area Project

Objectives of the evaluation: The MTE is a requirement of UNDP/GEF for projects with a planned lifetime of more than 5 or 6 years. It was agreed between the project steering committee and UNDP to carry out the MTE in April 2012. The MTE will provide material for decision makers whether, and if yes, how the second 4-year phase of the project will be implemented. The specific objectives of the MTE are to:
* Identify potential project design problems
* Assess progress towards the achievement of objectives
* Identify and document lessons learned (including lessons that might improve design and implementation of other UNDP/GEF projects)
* To make recommendations regarding the second phase
* Analyze the project performance up to now in the context of the institutional framework and events in Ethiopia during the first phase
* Analyze the trigger indicators for determining the entering into the next phase
* Provide recommendations on how the second phase should be designed. Scope of the evaluation The project advises and supports EWCA and to a certain extent the regional wildlife authorities on how to strengthen and run the protected area system of Ethiopia. The emphasis of the project in the first phase is on capacity building at federal level. Thus the project has no implementing capacities of its own. It works through the respective EWCA departments. The MTE has therefore to:
* Measure to what extent the capacity building process has been successful and what capacity building support has been provided to EWCA and the regional authorities will be needed in the second phase.
* Evaluation all activities supported by UNDP/GEF and, where appropriate, activities supported by the host institutions, EWCA and Ministry of Culture and Tourism (MoCT).
* Assess activities that other cooperating partners are supporting as long as there is a direct correlation with the project.
* Review of the measures taken by the project and propose shifts in emphasis where necessary.
* Assess the framework conditions (policies, laws, regulations etc.) and comment on their impact to the tasks of the project and EWCA.
* Describe EWCA's core functions and services, and how it is organised to deliver.
* Analyse EWCA’s performance and future requirements to strengthen it. Specifically, the evaluation report should assess:
* The relevance of the project within the local, national, regional and global context. The potential sustainability of results should be addressed and strategies to improve this element suggested.
* Will make a brief analysis of the regions’ Protected Areas (PA) set up, their strengths and weaknesses, how they fit in the national context, and the project’s future role in their performance.
* An analysis needs to be provided of the co-financing in the sector, with special emphasis on its relevance, size, cooperation with EWCA and project and modes of delivery.
* Assess whether the project’s partnership strategy has been appropriate and effective including the range and quality of partnerships and collaboration developed with government, civil society, donors, the private sector and whether these have contributed to improved project delivery.
* Assess relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the project administration
* Assess the sustainability and ownership of the project by the host organization
* Propose a design for the second phase (if there is any), including outcomes, outputs, indicators, timetable, consultancies, financing and lessons learned. Summarizing the above, the following key questions will be looked into:
* What progress toward the outcomes has been made?
* What factors have contributed to achieving or not achieving intended outcomes?
* To what extents have UNDP/GEF outputs and assistance contributed to outcomes?
* Has the project partnership strategy been appropriate and effective?
* How could the second phase of the project be designed and structured? Products Expected from the Evaluation The evaluation team will produce an evaluation reportof approximately 25 – 30 pages, excluding annexes, according to the attached detailed breakdown. The report will be in English and will be prepared and submitted in MS Word 2010, with tables in Excel where necessary.
* A PowerPoint presentation (10 – 15 slides) covering the key points of the MTE with the main findings and recommendations will also be provided.
* A draft of both of these should be submitted within two weeks of the end of data collection and meetings. The final copy will be submitted within a week of receiving written comments on the drafts.
* If there are any significant discrepancies between the impressions and findings of the evaluation team and stakeholders these should be explained in an Annex attached to the final report. Methodology Documentation review including, inter alia:
* Project Document and Logical Framework, including adaptations (inception report, etc. )
* Project implementation reports (PIR’s)
* Minutes of the National Steering Committee meetings
* Quarterly and annual progress reports and work plans of the project;
* Audits reports
* Financial and Administration guidelines;
* EWCA documentation (BPR, re-demarcation proposals, gazetting proclamation proposals, plans etc.)
* National policies and strategies, laws, regulations and guidelines regarding the sector,
* Films, workshop reports, studies and publications, field work reports, METT reports,
* National Development Plans (PASDEP and GTP) The following documents will also be available:
* The project M&E framework
* Knowledge products from service providers
* Project operational guidelines, manuals and systems maps
* The GEF Implementation Completion Report guidelines
* The UNDP Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks. Interviews with:
* UNDP/GEF staff who have project responsibilities
* Staff of the Project Coordination Unit;
* Executing agencies;
* Members of the Project Steering Committee
* Project stakeholders, particularly partners and project beneficiaries;
* Relevant staff in participating government departments. Field Visits: Detailed work will concentrate on selected PAs, representing the full spectre of PAs in Ethiopia. To be determined with the consultants, possibly to Awash, Senkelle, Bale, a Controlled Hunting Area, WR Alideghe, and a Community Conservation Area Implementation Arrangements
* Management arrangements – the consultant will closely liaise with the UNDP country office. The planning and the administrative arrangements for the MTE will be done in close cooperation with the UNDP/GEF office in Pretoria; This office has to approve the TOR and the composition of the team. (Consultation with the offices and their prior approval when the evaluation is being initiated by headquarters); The consultancy contracts will be issued by the UNDP Country Office Ethiopia according to its guidelines.
* Both the international and national consultants are equally accountable for the final evaluation report. Time frame - The expected duration of this work is 4 weeks with a start date of 1st April 2012, and the completion of the MTE by end of April, 2012.
* Desk review - 3 days
* Briefings for evaluators - 2 days
* Travel - 2 days
* Visits to the field (including allocation for travel), interviews, questionnaires - 10 days
* Debriefings - 2 days
* Validation of preliminary findings with stakeholders through circulation of initial reports for comments,
meetings, and other types of feedback mechanisms - 4 days
* Preparation of final evaluation report - 7 days Logistical support needed: vehicle hire for field visits and appointments with key interviewees. Furthermore a round trip ticket for the international consultant and DSA for both consultants when they are out of Addis Ababa. Reporting Arrangements The consultants will submit an inception report, a mid-term report and a final draft report for comments to both Ethiopian Wild Life Authority (EWCA) and the UNDP country representative in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The inception report will provide details of the methodological approach to be used by the consultants to undertake the study. The Ethiopian Wild Life Authority (EWCA) in partnership with UNDP will coordinate the study and keep abreast of the mission’s activities during the consultants stay. The study team will work closely with the Ethiopian Wild Life Authority (EWCA) and submit all draft reports to EWCA and UNDP; and once the final draft of the report is produced, the document will be reviewed in order to obtain feedbacks on the study; Only after incorporating and/or responding to all the comment shall the consultants produce and submit a final report to UNDP.

Competencies

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE Experience:
* He/she will be responsible for technical evaluation and comments of the local aspects of the project and their effect on the overall project design, implementation and impact.
* The National Consultant will have extensive experience in protected area conservation, wildlife management, research and monitoring, and tourism development.
* He/she will have an understanding and knowledge of government objectives, targets and strategies of the Wildlife sector, including the budgetary process; and how EWCA fits within this context.
* He/she should be an Ethiopian.
* Good interpersonal skills, ability to work well in international, multi-disciplinary teams, a flexible approach and the ability to multi-task and meet tight deadlines

How to apply: read the job details shown aboveif you feel that this job is suitable for you read the full details by clicking "View Full Details" buttonfollow the instructions shown in that new pagePlease note that each job has its own conditions and method to apply.
Didn't find what you were looking for?

* See other jobs in Ethiopia or at UNDP.

* Try using Advanced search.

* Try: Newest Vacancies, Upcoming Deadlines!, Vacancies Grouped by Organization,
Vacancies Grouped by Duty Station or Most Viewed Vacancies.

View the original article here